Bishops From Around the World on Ecology and Environmental Justice, Part III
Presented by the Blessed Kateri Tekakwitha Conservation Center
LET US PROTECT THE FIRST HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
My message to you on this occasion of the second anniversary of the "Think Clean, Think Green! Campaign" comes in two parts.
The first is simple and obvious enough. We must protect and preserve the physical world that God created for us to live in, because if we abuse it, we would upset its designated balance which God saw to be good (Gen 1:31). This world will end some day, but while we have it, we must cherish it as a gift from our loving and provident God. There are laws in nature that He has set, and it is within these guidelines that we can achieve dignified human existence while we wait for life after death.
The second is equally simple, though not quite obvious to many. It is based on this fact: the first and basic human environment where human beings first begin to exist must be given the protection that is due to it. The womb is the most endangered human environment today. We must not be blind to this, for if we allow chemical pollution in this first environment, then our efforts to protect subsequent human environments will prove useless. How can we advocate cleanliness in the external surroundings, if we deliberately introduce foreign and hostile objects into the internal ambience, with the intention of rendering it hostile to new life?
That is why -- if we are to be integral and consistent in our advocacy -- we must make sure that it is free of pollution and that its mechanisms and the cycles essential to its ecology and habitability are preserved, so that the new life that God designed to begin there -- with the loving cooperation of husband and wife -- may receive the best treatment that "mother nature" can give. This is the integral environmental ethic that is necessary to achieve "one world" and "one family" caring for "one earth". Furthermore, we ought not be neutral before the separation of unborn babies from their rightful nesting place. This separation is the antithesis of the unity we so sincerely seek, for unity is achieved only in love, and love is never neutral. Neutrality hurts the beloved.
And so, let us not merely think clean, let us truly be clean -- not merely on the outside, but even more so on the inside; we must not move about merely in the physical world, but we must live in the Kingdom of the Spirit. For heaven and earth will pass away, but the words of God will never pass away (cf. Mt 24:23-31).
-- June 5, 1994
Bishop Karl Golser
"Even back when he was the cardinal of Munich, [Pope Benedict XVI] gave homilies in which he lamented that the theology of Creation has been overlooked in the period since the Second Vatican Council. Post-conciliar theology wanted to emphasize the history of salvation, but for him it was equally important to see that everything, the entire cosmos, has been created in view of Jesus Christ.
In other words, Creation and Redemption go together. From that point of departure, he often goes back to St. Francis of Assisi, even to Marian devotion, with the idea that all of Creation in a way enters in this Marian function of preparing for the arrival of the Redeemer. Everything has been born in order to glorify God.
This is the specific point about our Christian faith, and what sets apart the way the Holy Father approaches this question from the secular environmental movement. Some currents can be pantheistic, or sometimes they downplay the special place of humanity in favor of the concept of this great "Gaia," and so on. People sometimes criticize the Christian vision of the environment for being anthropocentric, but in fact it's theocentric. We can only understand Creation by seeing it in terms of [the] mystery of the Trinity. Of course, there's also an eschatological dimension, which is that all of Creation must be reborn and presented anew to the Father through Christ."
"Its not an accident that many of the Holy Father's comments on the environment have come on Sundays... That's very important. Sunday is the day we live the joy of redemption, and it also expresses a new relationship with time and space. It's about the return to Christ, the Parousia. In the Eucharist, it's also about offering the earth itself back to God, in the consecration of bread and wine."
"I think [Pope Benedict XVI's] contribution is really recuperating the thought of the fathers of the Church. John Paul II was a great mystic, and a philosopher. Others approach the environment through the lens of natural law or the social doctrine of the Church. The approach of Benedict XVI, on the other hand, is clearly rooted in the fathers, in scripture, in liturgy. If you read his homilies, there’s a profound spirituality of the environment there. That also comes through in messages for the World Day of Peace, his messages for New Year’s – there’s always an ecological dimension... He sees ecology within a broader vision of globalization, connecting the problems of development and poverty to commitment for the environment. "
~ From an interview with John L. Allen, "Interview with the Pope's New 'Eco-Bishop,'" National Catholic Reporter Conversation Cafe, December 9, 2008, http://ncrcafe.org/node/2324
Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales
The Call to Creation:
God's Invitation
and the Human Response
The Natural
Environment and Catholic Social Teaching
I. Introduction
It has become clear that care for the environment presents a major challenge for
the whole of humanity in the 21st Century. The Catholic Bishops' Conference of
England and Wales wishes to add its voice to the many calling for urgent action
to protect our earthly home from further destruction. A way of life that
disregards and damages God's creation, forces the poor into greater poverty, and
threatens the right of future generations to a healthy environment and to their
fair share of the earth's wealth and resources, is contrary to the vision of the
Gospel.
The environmental crisis is especially complex since it involves not only many
branches of scientific knowledge, but also politics and economics. The Church
recognizes and respects the 'autonomy of earthly affairs' in all these
disciplines (Second Vatican Council, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the
Modern World, 1965, Section 36). Its own task is to 'read the signs of the
times' and uncover the spiritual and moral issues that lie at the root of the
challenges of our time.
Care for the environment is fundamental to the universal good, since the health
and well-being of all life depends on a healthy environment. The full human
development of every human person both now and in future generations cannot be
separated from the fate of the earth.
In Catholic social teaching the concept of the common good 'implies that every
individual , no matter how high or low, has a duty to share in promoting the
welfare of the community as well as a right to benefit from that welfare'
(Catholic Bishops' Conference of England and Wales, The Common Good and the
Catholic Church's Social Teaching, 1996, Section 70). Therefore, if the
environmental crisis affects us all each of us has the responsibility to play
our part in addressing that crisis. What is happening to the earth indicates
that we must think beyond local and national interests and define 'the
community' in global terms. The way we live and the choices we make affect the
lives of others: not only human life, in fact, but also the other forms of life
found on the earth. In 1983 the Catholic Bishops of the USA, referring to the
nuclear threat, wrote, 'We are the first generation since Genesis with the power
to threaten the created order'. Today we are threatened by the disregard of a
minority for the manner in which its way of life affects the rest of the world.
The Bishops' Conference offers these reflections to all people of goodwill,
particularly to Catholics, Christians of other denominations, and followers of
those other religions that recognize the earth as the gift of a loving Creator.
The task before us is 'the shared problem of the human race' (Common Good,
Section 106) and therefore demands the united effort of all humanity.
II. What have we done to the earth?
Damage to the environment affects every part of creation. Hardly a day goes by
without some mention of these matters by radio, television and newspapers. For
many people, this volume of information can be bewildering, since the issues are
so wide-ranging, and many do not at first sight concern us here in England and
Wales. The problems can be grouped into four main areas.
Damage to the earth's life-sustaining mechanisms
The natural world is made up of many different delicate and intricately
interconnected cycles that have nurtured and sustained life for millions of
years, giving fertile soil, clean water and a pure atmosphere. Now these
life-sustaining mechanisms are breaking down through pollution and abuse. In
many places fresh water once teeming with life is dead, beautiful coasts have
been turned into sewers, fertile soil lies barren or has turned into desert.
Forests, often described as the lungs of the earth, are reduced to wasteland,
and cities are choked with smog. Emissions of 'greenhouse gases' continue to
affect the atmosphere in ways that threaten the balance of life on the planet.
The resulting climate change could severely disrupt the lives of all of
humankind.
Depletion of the world's natural resources
Our wealth and our way of life depend on the raw materials that are earth's
gifts to us. Everything we produce and consume derives from these raw materials.
Yet these finite resources are being exploited as if they remained available in
infinite quantities. In the last forty years of the twentieth century, world
consumption of metals, minerals and other materials more than doubled.
Scarcities arising from the depletion of non-renewable natural resources
threaten international stability as well as those who immediately depend on
them.
The impact on the world's poor
Environmental destruction and social injustice often go hand-in-hand. Damage to
the environment will almost inevitably affect the poor most of all, since poor
communities inevitably inhabit the worst and most vulnerable locations. What is
more, 80% of the world's resources are commandeered by the richest 20% of the
world's population. In other words, we in affluent countries take far more than
our fair share of the world's goods. Much of our consumption becomes waste
almost immediately. Meanwhile, 20% of humanity remains destitute, lacking even
the basic necessities of clean water, adequate food, shelter and clothing.
One key principle of Catholic social teaching is that of the 'universal
destination of material goods'. In the fourth century, the great bishop St
Ambrose, citing the Gospel of Luke, wrote as follows:
If God's providence bestows an unfailing supply of food on the birds of the air
who neither sow nor reap, we ought to realize that the reason for people's
supply running short is human greed. The fruits of the earth were given to feed
all without distinction and nobody can claim any particular rights. Instead, we
have lost the sense of the communion of goods, rushing to turn these goods into
private property. (St Ambrose, On the Gospel of St Luke)
The right to private ownership, therefore, has strict limits, set in particular
by the urgent need of others. The environment is a prime example of a good that
is essentially shared, and is not to be monopolized by powerful individuals and
groups.
The loss of beauty and diversity
Human activity has always shaped its environment, including many places now
considered areas of great 'natural beauty'. But more recently economic growth,
technology, urbanization and the shift in land-ownership from small farmers to
powerful corporations have magnified the scale of this human impact. Grasslands
and forests are destroyed for commercial gain, the oceans are over-exploited,
species become extinct. Our need for beauty and our communion with the other
creatures of the earth are also denied.
III. Understanding the 'signs of the times'
The environmental crisis has revealed the interdependence of all creation.
Whatever we do, whatever choices we make, other people and the earth itself are
affected. The symptoms of distress that have been outlined indicate that many
human beings have lost an understanding of their true place in creation. By
regarding the natural world merely as the 'setting' in which we live, and by
treating the gifts of creation solely for the satisfaction of our supposed needs
as consumers, we have become alienated from the earth and from each other, and
so also from God. As Pope John Paul II put it in his message for World Peace Day
in 1990, 'The gravity of the ecological situation reveals how deep is the human
moral crisis' (Section 13). To recover health and harmony these broken
relationships must be restored and healed. The plight of the earth demonstrates
that an individualistic materialism cannot be allowed to drive out
responsibility and love, and that care for those in need, and respect for the
rights of future generations, are necessary to sustain a proper life for all.
It is a encouraging, though, that many people already recognize these deeper
implications. In Seoul in 1990 the World Council of Churches called all
Christians to embrace the cause of 'Justice, Peace and the Integrity of
Creation' and to work to achieve a sustainable way of life. Many Christian
Churches, and people from other religious traditions and from none, have
advocated a new attitude towards the environment, and recent popes have echoed
the words of St Ambrose, quoted above, by stressing that the earth and its
resources are given for the whole of humankind, including future generations,
not just for the privileged few of today. An organization such as CAFOD makes no
grant for development or humanitarian work without considering its environmental
implications. All these persons represent an 'ecological conversion which in
recent decades has made humanity more sensitive to the catastrophe to which it
has been heading. Man is no longer the Creator's "steward" but an autonomous
despot, who is finally beginning to understand that he must stop at the edge of
the abyss' (Pope John Paul II, 19 January 2001 to a general audience in St
Peter's Square). The Pope continued, 'At stake, then, is not only a physical
ecology that is concerned to safeguard the habitat of various living beings, but
also a human ecology which makes the existence of creatures more dignified, by
protecting the fundamental good of life in all its manifestations and by
preparing for future generations an environment more in conformity with the
Creator's plan'.
IV. Rediscovering moral and scriptural foundations
Christians see the world through the lens of faith. Our responses to the
environmental crisis will therefore draw on our own moral and religious
foundations, as well as on other rich traditions of faith.
Creation has value in itself
We believe that God is the Creator of everything there is and that this creation
is good, reflecting God's own goodness (Genesis 1-2). God loves creation for its
own sake, and God's love holds everything in existence for its own mysterious
purpose (Psalms 104:29-30). Creation has its own relationship with God, in some
measure independently of humankind and beyond human understanding: it glorifies
and worships God in continuous praise (Psalms 96:12; Isaiah 55:12). Our
destructiveness can silence creation's song of praise to God, our care for
creation can be a true expression of our own praise. Such a perspective
challenges any narrowly economistic view that the gifts of creation have value
except as a 'factor of production'.
Creation has value because it reveals God
The Creator's 'eternal power and divine nature, invisible though they are, have
been understood and seen through the things he has made' (Romans 1:20). Nature
reveals God to us and allows us to experience God's presence. For example,
people of faith have testified that nature's abundance and beauty reveals God's
generosity and majesty, its healing, nourishing and life-giving properties
reveal divine reconciling love. In the thirteenth century, St Thomas Aquinas
argued that the diversity of the extraordinary array of creatures roaming the
earth revealed the richness of the nature of God.
And because one single creature was not enough, he produced many diverse
creatures, so that what was wanting in one expression of the divine goodness
might be supplied by another; for goodness, which in God is single and all
together, in creatures is multiple and scattered. Hence the whole universe less
incompletely than one alone shares and represents his goodness' (Summa
Theologica, ia 47.1).
When we allow creation to be degraded and damaged, therefore, we lose our sense
of God's very self.
Jesus points to the lilies of the field and the birds of the air as beautiful in
their own right ('Not even Solomon in all his royal robes was clothed like one
of these') but also as revealing the care of God for all beings (Matthew 6:
26-30), a care that can liberate us from the kind of anxiety that deflects us
from seeking God's kingdom first. His authority over the immense power of the
sea awes the disciples who experience it, because it is only God who has
sovereignty over the forces of Creation.
Human Beings are dependent but responsible
Human beings are created in the image of God (Genesis 1:27), and have the
special gift and challenge of sharing in God's creative activity. We use, and by
using we transform, the natural world. As 'co-creators', then, our acts should
reflect God's own love for creation. We ourselves are part of creation, formed
out of the earth, and dependent on the rest of creation for our continued
existence: so we are made aware that caring for creation is part of caring for
ourselves (Genesis 2:15). There is a covenant of mutual care and respect that
unites God, humankind and every other living creature (Genesis 9).
Creation reveals human sin
Our capacity to marvel at the earth, but also to develop and utilize its
resources (for instance through the application of science and technology), has
greatly enriched our lives. This human creativity carries with it a profound
responsibility. However, it is also part of Christian faith to recognize that we
are sinners: in our present context, this truth means that sin has distorted the
human relationship with the natural world: we have disturbed the balance of
nature in radical and violent ways. As Pope John Paul II has written, 'Man
thinks that he can make arbitrary use of the earth, subjecting it without
restraint to his will, as though the earth did not have its own requisites and a
prior, God-given purpose, which man indeed can develop but must not betray
Instead of carrying out his role as a co-operator with God in the work of
creation, man sets himself up in place of God and thus ends up in provoking a
rebellion on the part of nature, which is more tyrannized than governed by him'
(Pope John Paul II, Centesimus Annus, 1991, Section 37).
Sin damages our relationships with God and with one another, the relationships
between social groups, and that between humanity and the earth. As the prophets
of the Old Testament testify, such sin is reflected in the earth's suffering:
'The earth dries up and withers, the world languishes and withers; the heavens
languish together with the earth. The earth lies polluted under its inhabitants;
for they have transgressed laws, violated the statutes, broken the everlasting
covenant' (Isaiah 24:4-5). 'Therefore the land mourns, and all who live in it
languish; together with the wild animals and the birds of the air, even the fish
of the sea are perishing' (Hosea 4:2-3).
Creation participates in our redemption
We live out our relationship with God as dwellers on the earth. Our use of the
gifts of creation forms part of that relationship. To love God is, among other
things, to give thanks and praise for these gifts, to honor and respect them for
themselves, to acknowledge that they are destined by God for all people, and
therefore to share the gifts of the earth justly. God constantly calls us back
from sin to repentance and conversion. In thinking of the environment, we can
say that the antidote to the sin of exploitative greed is found in the virtue of
care and respect. It is partly in this sense that St Paul daringly argues that
the earth itself shares in our redemption and salvation. 'Therefore creation too
waits with eager longing...that the creation itself will be set free from its
bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom and the glory of the children of
God. We know that the whole creation has been groaning in labor pains until now'
(Romans 8:19 seq).
Creation in the world to come
Our present life already participates in the life to come. Jesus says, 'The
Kingdom of God is among you' (Luke 17: 21), and we have been given the vision of
the new heavens and the new earth as an inspiration for the present as well as a
sign of hope for the future. We are partners in God's creative enterprise,
called to 'renew the face of the earth' until there is peace and harmony,
sparkling life-giving water, the 'trees of life' that give health and the
messianic banquet that can be shared by all the inhabitants of the earth. Then
'the curse of destruction will be abolished' (Revelation 22: 1-3).
V. Responding to the Cry of Creation
The cry of creation prompts us all to ask 'What then should we do?' (Luke 3:10).
What is needed is 'not merely a feeling of vague compassion or shallow distress
at the hardships of many people, both near and far. On the contrary, it is a
firm and persevering determination to commit ourselves to the common good: that
is to say, to the good of all and of each individual because we really are
responsible for all.' (Pope John Paul II, Sollicitudo Rei Socialis, 1988,
Section 38).
Education towards ecological responsibility
It is encouraging to note that environmental awareness now plays a greater part
in formal education: but it is important that this education enables people
gradually to take up their personal responsibilities. Education that focuses
solely on the elements of science and technology cannot offer a framework of
moral values to guide the daily decisions of living. We need an education that
helps liberate people from enslavement to a way of life that values consumption,
convenience, wealth, status and economic growth above all else, an education
that begins to give them the freedom to make different choices. 'This education
is not something that can be based on emotion or vague aspirations. Its goal can
be neither ideological nor political, and its program cannot rest on a rejection
of the modern world or on the vague desire to return to a "paradise lost". True
education about responsibility involves a genuine conversion in the way we think
and behave' (Pope John Paul II, World Peace Day Message, 1990, Section 13).
Personal Responsibility and Conversion of Life
Such a change of attitude calls for a fundamentally new orientation towards the
purpose of material possessions. 'It is not wrong to want to live better. What
is wrong is a style of life which is presumed to be better when it is directed
towards having rather than being and which wants to have more, not in order to
be more but in order to spend life in enjoyment as an end in itself.' (Pope John
Paul II, Centesimus Annus, Section 37). We are called to reflect on our
individual roles and purposes in life and ask ourselves what we need to develop
our human qualities, to grow in love of God and neighbor. In a context of
environmental justice, this reflection will allow us to make serious choices -
including the choice not to consume what we do not need and, above all, what is
likely to harm others.
All religious traditions encourage simplicity of life, often even a certain
austerity. In the Christian tradition, this wisdom derives from the Lord's own
profound saying, 'Where your treasure is, there will your heart be too' (Matthew
6: 21). The desire for affluence, for more and more possessions, for almost
anything new, can begin to dominate us. In a consumerist age, the pressure
exerted on us by the advertising industry and by the visibility of luxury goods
all around us encourages the assumption that it is our right to use the gifts of
creation entirely as we wish. It will require continuing reflection about how
our habits of life can all too easily become excessive and wasteful, and how
they affect the well-being of others, to counter these pressures. Nevertheless,
to do so is a way of co-operating with Christ's mission to bring reconciliation
and peace, and indeed can truly be a way of learning afresh to love God and our
neighbor.
Individual actions may seem insignificant but together the small steps of many
people can have an astonishing impact. Each person's joyful choices can be a
visible example to others and give them courage to follow. Public pressure
becomes powerful when it reflects a mature moral vision that respects the rights
of others to a decent life now and in the future.
Acting in Partnership: Other Churches and Faiths
Many different groups are to be found where people come together to support and
encourage each other towards environmental justice. Amongst these are numerous
church-linked programs and activities. Christians can work together ecumenically
at parish level and nationally. The Environmental Issues Network of Churches
Together in Britain and Ireland provides one such ecumenical forum. The network
Christian Ecology Link has an active Catholic section. At a continental level
there is the European Christian Environmental Network, open to all the Christian
Churches. Christians can also give common witness to the value and goodness of
creation with other faiths, not least Judaism and Islam which share our belief
in God, the loving Creator of all that is.
Acting in Partnership: Civil Structures
Recent government reports about the effects of global warming indicate the
concern at the highest level about some aspects of the environmental crisis. It
is encouraging that the 'Kyoto Protocol', deriving from the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, held in Kyoto, Japan, in 1997, has now
been ratified by more than seventy countries and (in June 2002) was ratified as
a bloc by every state of the European Union, though it is still opposed by some
important countries such as the USA and Australia. The Protocol would require
states to restrict their industrial emissions so as to prevent the increase of
greenhouse gases.
The wide support given to the Kyoto Protocol shows that governments can create
structures that encourage and enable citizens to live in a more ecological way,
for example through environmentally responsible transport systems and energy
policies, by tax incentives, and by supporting the development of facilities to
promote sustainable living. Since these governments have often signed the
protocol under strong pressure from their own civil society, we learn, too, that
with the active support and co-operation of all sectors of society real change
is possible. But such results can only be achieved if electors are willing to
let go of the relentless search for the maximization of consumption, and
opposition political parties, as well as the governments, refuse to allow the
search for short-term political gain to block the necessary measures.
Environmental problems cross state boundaries: so governments, particularly
those of the rich countries of the world, need to co-operate to develop common
policies to limit environmental damage and to promote environmental protection,
as well as to confront together the injustice of excessive wealth in a world
where there is abject poverty. Developing countries cannot be expected to forego
their own economic progress so that the rich can exploit the earth's resources
unchallenged.
Acting in solidarity
In September 2002 the world's nations will gather in Johannesburg for the World
Summit on Sustainable Development. This crucial meeting needs our support and
prayers. In his foreword to the State of the World 2002, a report from the
Worldwatch Institute, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan,
wrote that the Johannesburg Summit 'can and must lead to a strengthened global
recognition of the importance of achieving a sustainable balance between nature
and the human economy'. He recognized that nations are currently at very
different levels of development and therefore have different responsibilities,
but face common threats and are offered common opportunities if we can 'respond
to this challenge as a single human community.'
The Summit will recognize that the struggle to protect the environment has to
take account of the destitution still rife in the world. It will assess the
ecological implications of continued economic globalization, and seek to give
new life to the international treaties on biodiversity, climate change, forests
and desertification. This agenda will present governments, but also all of us,
with massive challenges: for example, climate change is not just a matter of
political negotiation but confronts our every assumption about how we live our
lives. The extent of the Summit's success or failure will seriously affect the
future of our earth and its peoples.
At the end of their Low Week Meeting in April this year the Bishops Conference
of England and Wales issued a resolution urging all Catholics to pay close and
prayerful attention to this summit, and they also affirmed the teaching of Pope
John Paul II that 'the dramatic threat of ecological breakdown is teaching us
the extent to which greed and selfishness - both individual and collective - are
contrary to the order of creation, an order which is characterized by mutual
interdependence.' In their different ways, the Pope and the Secretary-General of
the United Nations can be understood as re-stating for our time the vital
insight of St Ambrose in the fourth century.
Individual choices can seem insignificant when faced with such global
challenges. But multiplied individual actions can indeed make a real difference.
The Johannesburg Summit must not be allowed to fail through governments' refusal
to take decisive action because they think public opinion is against them. Faith
groups have the specific task of communicating to their governments the
spiritual and moral foundations of sustainable living and development.
The Johannesburg Summit is the opportunity for every form of social organization
to work together: international institutions, governments, non-governmental
organizations, business leaders, scientists and so on. 'In an increasingly
global society, the unit of human community to which the term 'common good'
applies moves from the national to the international level. Hence solidarity has
an inescapable universal dimension. Solidarity requires action to protect the
common good at this level, where it can only be safeguarded by the collaboration
of all' (The Common Good, Section 102). It is the logic of our present argument
that solidarity must, in a genuine sense, extend to nature itself, as we learn
to live in ways that are consistent with its God-given laws.
VI. Conclusion
Christians, particularly perhaps Catholic Christians, are reminded of the
precious gifts of creation at each Eucharistic celebration. In the ancient
prayer over the gifts of bread and wine we praise God our Creator, and remember
that these material goods are given to us by God and are fashioned through the
co-operation of Creator and creature: so our own daily living is to reflect our
gratitude for the gifts that have been given to us. Again, in the Eucharist we
join in the self-giving, the sacrifice, of Christ himself, and in this sense the
offering of our own lives - time, convenience, money - for the good of others
can itself be Eucharistic, a 'sacrifice' for the good of others. In the
Eucharist we, the priestly people, the Church, are empowered to transform and
use what we have been given. This act of transformation is a sacred act. But it
is for all, to nourish all, for the life and salvation of all.
2002
Main Menu Introduction Peace with God and all Creation Ecological Conversion Declaration on Environment Hebrew Scripture Christian Scripture Catechism Pope John Paul II Saints Lay/Religious St. Francis Kateri Tekakwitha St. Thérèse Population Creation Theology Get Involved Prayers Resources Links About Us
Copyright © 2000-2011 by Bill Jacobs and the Blessed Kateri Tekakwitha Conservation Center. All Rights Reserved.